I was curious whether Gitea or its recent fork, Forgejo, has had more development activity. I cloned both repos (Gitea’s from GitHub; Forgejo’s from Codeberg, which runs on Forgejo) and ran this command:

$ git log --since="1 year ago" --format="%an" | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | wc -l

to get an overview of things. That showed 153 people (including a small handful of bots) contributing to Gitea, and 232 people (and a couple of bots) contributing to Forgejo. There are some dupes in each list — showing separate accounts for “John Doe” and “johndoe”, that kind of thing — but the numbers look small and similar to me so I think they can be safely ignored.

Some commenters have suggested that Gitea’s development model rebases pull requests onto the main branch instead of applying the individual commits, and that Forgejo does the opposite. This would make it artificially look as though Forgejo has more commit activity.

However, it looks to me like Forgejo is using a similar process of combining lots of smaller PR commits into a single merge commit. The wide majority of its commits since June 2024 or so seem to be 1-commit-per-PR. Changing the above command to --since="2024-07-01" reduces the number of unique contributors to 136 for Gitea and 217 for Forgejo. It also shows 1,228 commits for Gitea and 3,039 for Forgejo, and I do think that’s a legitimately apples-to-apples comparison.

If we brute force it and run

$ git log --since="1 year ago" | rg '\(\#\d{4,5}\)' | wc -l

to match lines that mention a PR (like “Simplify review UI (#31062)” or “Remove title from email heads (#3810)”), then I find 1,256 PR-like Gitea commits and 2,181 Forgejo commits.

I also wondered how many committers were in both repos. I got this from:

$ git log --since="2024-07-01" --format="%an" | sort | uniq > /tmp/users.{whichever}
$ comm -12 users.gitea users.forgejo | wc -l # Users with commits in both
      67
$ comm -13 users.gitea users.forgejo | wc -l # Users with Forgejo commits, but not Gitea
     150
$ comm -23 users.gitea users.forgejo | wc -l # Users with Gitea commits, but not Forgejo
      69

67 users committed to both. Without digging into it, the likeliest explanation to me is that this is mostly due to the projects pulling commits from each other, although nothing I know of keeps an author from sending patches to both. 69 contributors participated in Gitea and not Forgeo. Another 150 contributed to Forgejo but not Gitea.

And finally, their respective activity pages (for Gitea and for Forgejo) show a similar story.

I’m not an expert in methodology here, but from my initial poking around, it would seem to me that Forgejo has a lot more activity and a larger variety of contributors than Gitea does.